|
|
Rossum (Continued from p.4)
and the ubiquitous ribbon cable tethering it all
together. Without getting into the specific chips
used, over time faster processors and cheaper memo-
ry have allowed for higher sampling rates, longer bit
word lengths, more voices in the polyphony, and
cleaner digital-to-analog conversion. Rossum noted
that the price which E-mu has paid for memory ICs
has fairly closely tracked Moore's Law, in that the
price per bit of memory has gone down by a factor of
4000 over the course of E-mu's existence.
When asked about whether there was any new
ground left to explore, Rossum charted out his view
of the history of synthesizers on "Expressive" versus
"Fidelity" axes. He characterized early analog and
FM synthesizers as being neither very expressive or
having high fidelity. Wavetable synthesizers, which
is E-mu's forte, were classified as having good fidelity
but not very expressive; physical modeling tech-
niques provided good expressivity without very high
fidelity. The "Holy Grail" as he called it, would be
to have a system that is highly expressive while main-
taining high fidelity. Of course, lower cost and easier
to use product interfaces are also ongoing goals.
Rossum also played a variety of musical selections
made with these differentE-mu synthesizer prod-
ucts, which helped to highlight the evolution of the
technology. The sounds generated on the very early
products were somewhat artificial indeed, but the
realism increased dramatically on selections made
with the more modern platforms.
A good turnout was on hand for Rossum's presenta-
tion, and they kept him busy after the meeting with
numerous questions.
Tom Wethern
|
|